<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media Assignment #2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daveamos.com/post/213/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daveamos.com/post/213</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 01:09:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maurice Reid</title>
		<link>http://daveamos.com/post/213/comment-page-1#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurice Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daveamos.com/?p=213#comment-76</guid>
		<description>The strength of SketchUp the way you can quickly visualize individual parts and volume. When you translate that to plans, sections or elevations, think about how you how you can make decisions about architecture. For example, your SketchUp diagrams and your plans look like the same thing. Try to visualize the relationships of size in SketchUp and then draw the plan or section with a variety of volume relationships, hopefully it leads to different forms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The strength of SketchUp the way you can quickly visualize individual parts and volume. When you translate that to plans, sections or elevations, think about how you how you can make decisions about architecture. For example, your SketchUp diagrams and your plans look like the same thing. Try to visualize the relationships of size in SketchUp and then draw the plan or section with a variety of volume relationships, hopefully it leads to different forms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
